requestId:68499abd2a6504.34120908.
About “Year Dong’s School” and “Year Breeding and Delicate Identity” – a discussion on the differences between Dong Zhongshu
Author: Guo Xiaodong
Source: “Modern Confucianism” third album, edited by Guo Xiaodong, Sanlian Bookstore November 2018 edition
Time: Confucius was the 15th day of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the 15th month of the style=”mso-bidi-font-weight:normal”>1. Introduction
In the history of Chinese thinking, in charge of Ban Gu (32-92) and Dong Zhongshu (about 179-104 BC) “became a Confucian scholar”[1], Zhu Zi (1130-1200) called Dong Zhongshu “the original leader is pure and upright” and “the quality is pure and good”, <!–[if !supportFootnotes]—[if !supportFootnotes]—[1], Zhu Zi (1130-1200) called Dong Zhongshu “the original leader is pure and upright” and “the quality is pure and good”, [2], but in fact, Dong Zhongshu was not really valued for a long time. The book “Years and Blossoms” is as Euro-Yang Xiu (1007-1072) said, “Issue Repeated”[3], and the details were missing. The keys for the Siming Building of the Southern Song Dynasty (1137-1213) were compiled by the Southern Song Dynasty, and there were many books to be written. Only after the book was proofreaded by Lu Wenpai of the Qing Dynasty (1717-1795) proofread the book, the book was basically readable. Even so, Dong Zi’s learning did not really embrace the students’ vision, and the situation changed until the rise of modern literary studies in the Qing Dynasty. During the Qianlong period, Changzhou Zhuancun and (1719-1788) “Zongyang Jiangdu”[4], whose book “Age” was correct, began to pay attention to the meaning of “Age” mentioned by Dong Zi. Later, Ling Xiaolou (1775-1829) wrote “The Ancient and Familiar Lu Notes”, which was annotated by the Kaishan work. The book was composed of chapters and sentences and sermons, not only the textual proofreading, but also made many attempts to express the meaning of Gongyang in “The Ancient and Familiar Lu”. Therefore, Liang Rengong (1873-1929) praised him and said: “The learning of Xiaolou and Liu was familiar with the family rules of Gongyang, so the annotation was the same as Duan’s “Shiwen””. [5] However, some critics still believe that Ling’s moral development is still improved. [6]From a certain meaning, those who truly reach the level of theory are those who are deeply rooted in Dong Zi’s learning, who wrote “The Age of Dong” by Kam Kang Youwei (1858-1927) and “The Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Su (1872-1914).
Kang Youxi wrote a book for “The Age of Dong” in the 20th year of Guangchang (1894) and published by the Shanghai General Books Bureau in the 23rd year of Guangchang (1897). Like “A Study on the Reform of Confucius”, this book is a theoretical evidence to further improve its thinking. As we all know, the most important theoretical basis of Kang and Liang’s transformation is Gongyang’s “Year”. Among Gongyang Xianshu, Kang Youxiong was the most concerned about Dong Zhongshu, saying that “the teacher said the most detailed. He was not far away from the pre-Qin period. However, if he wanted to learn “Gongyang”, he would give up Dong’s life?”[7]Dongzi was the leader of “Gongyang”, which was the key point of “Gongyang”, and “Gongyang” was the basis of “Gongyang”, and “Gongyang” was the basis of “Gongyang”, and “Gongyang” was the basis of “Gongyang”, and “Gongyang” was the basis of “Gongyang”, and “Gongyang” was the basis of “Gongyang”, and “Gongyang” was the basis of “Gongyang”, and “Gongyang” was the basis of “Gongyang”, and “Gongyang” was the basis of “Gongyang”, and “Gongyang” was the basis of “Gongyang”, and “Gongyang” was the basis of “Gongyang”. [8]
I even think that Dong Zi’s position is higher than that of Meng and Xun:
There are many things like Meng and Xun, and they are the dragon objects of Confucius. They seek to obtain the foundation of Confucius’ establishment, such as the subtle words of “Fan Lu” that the meaning of the “Fan Lu” cannot be achieved. Dong Shengdao is not higher than Meng and Xun, why did he get this? However, it is all expressed by Confucius’s words, not by Dong Zi. The words of King Wen were well-known: King Wen’s literature was conveyed to Confucius. Confucius’s writings were published in Zhongshu. Therefore, what I said was that Xun Chao Meng was actually the only one in the Confucian community. If Dong is born in a minor way, how can you recover Confucius’s great way! [9]
This Kang You wrote eight volumes of “Year Dong’s School” with his fellow disciples. Through the inventing the subtle words of “Year Wang” such as the restructuring of “Year” by Da Kang You’s own thinking and learning. However, after the book was revealed, it was criticized by dramas from the “Yi Cult” scholars at that time. Su Xu of Pingjiang said:
I am good at reading Dong Sheng’s books. I first got the Ling family’s annotation, but I regret that it was widely quoted, but I have not investigated it. It is said that there are those who are a student of Dong, and the meaning of the supporting price ptt is a remarkable remark. [10]
It is also said:
Where is a member of the “Year Dong Family”, which splits the branches and leaves, and is suspected of being a later study. For example, Dong 彩票线版 regards what he does not see as “small words”, but uses the zodiac, life, and gas transformation, and combines foreign teachers and lists it as “small words”, which is the truth of the shadow attached; the three systems are reformed, and since Confucius’ “Year” is used as the new king, while the three systems are followed by Shang and Zhou, they move to Confucius’ restructuring, and the Xia, Shang and Zhou are used as the three systems. This is not clear in the rules; the zodiac is taken from Ju, and the eight grams are used as “spoken” and the “Gongyang” is regarded as “spoken” and this is the Weizhou that is passed on. Others are even less distinctive. [11]
It is obvious that the “Kingshi” mentioned here refers to Kang Youwei. Unlike other wing teachers, such as Ye Dehua (1864-1927), who was so angry that he went to Dong Zhongshu and regarded books such as “Gongyang Ji” and “Year Fanlu” as “books compiled by Han people.” [12]For Su Hui, not only has he been “easy to read Dong Sheng’s books” since he was a child, but he also believes that “Year-Feng Lu” is the “First Book” said by the masters of Xihan. [13]But in Su Hui’s opinion, there are many serious and lack of “slight words” and “restructuring”, “along with the sarcasm, it has become a strange thing, which has made Dong Sheng’s pure Confucianism pass the world to expound.” [14]Su wrote the seventeenth volume of “Certificate of Ages and Dew” to clarify the learning of Dong Zhongshu and “Gongyang” by Kang You, and thus achieved the goal of “regular learning” with “wing teaching”.